The Government plans to scrap planning permission on extensions to boost economy

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Radical proposed changes to the planning system allowing free-for-all home extensions could see neighbours at loggerheads, a critic has warned.

Under new Government proposals unveiled this week, homeowners will be able to extend their properties without planning permission.

The one year scheme could see a frenzy of conservatories, garages and loft extensions popping up all over Kent, without consulting neighbours on their views.

The Government wants to relax strict restrictions for homeowners and businesses in a bid to kick-start the ailing economy and stimulate growth.

But, the plans have been condemned by critics who say it is not a solution to the country’s financial woes.

The scheme would allow homeowners to extend their properties by up to six or eight metres without permission, depending on whether it is terraced or detached. Currently, permission from the local authority is required for extensions of more than three or four metres.

Businesses will be able to expand shops by 100 square metres and industrial units by 200 square metres.

By getting rid of the red tape surrounding the process, the Government is hoping to boost jobs for the construction industry, which has suffered in recent years.

The current planning system has come under fire for taking too long and costing too much money. It can take more than eight weeks to get permission to extend a property.

But director at CPRE Protect Kent, Hilary Newport, said the system is there for a reason and extensions without neighbour consent could cause disputes.

She said: “Sometimes there are very good reasons why they say no to a development. Enabling homeowners to build extensions is headline grabbing, but is not a solution to the problem.

“This is a short term resolution to something that does not warrant ripping up the planning system which has served us perfectly well.”

Builder Paul Hayward from Thanet Build said that he doesn’t think the plans will make much of a difference as people cannot afford to extend their homes.

He said: “I think it’s more to do with financial restrictions rather than the red tape. Homeowners will still have to go through building regulations anyway so it’s not enough.”

Kent Invicta Chamber of Commerce chief executive Jo James said the announcement will help businesses, but that they still need financial help.

She said: “The measures on the whole are a positive and can unblock some of the barriers to build. They do not address the main issue around encouraging development, which needs the access to finance to make things happen.

“If easing the planning progress is to create employment, then it has to be a positive move, but unless the continual problem of access to business finance is not sorted then it will not have the desired outcome.”

North Thanet MP Roger Gale said the plans will speed up the process and benefit small building firms by providing them with more work.

He said: “I think the planning process is hopelessly over regulated. There is a significant deterrent - if you know you have to spend hundreds and sometimes thousands getting planning consent, you get to the point when the cost of the process costs more than the project.

“I think quite a lot of people will say, right, now bureaucracy is out of the way we can get on and get it done.

“It’s not going to be earth shattering, but it will make a difference. It will encourage employment for small builders. There is a huge amount of work for small builders in extensions.”

MP for Folkestone and Hythe Damian Collins said: “I think the whole thing about letting people build in their back gardens without permission is a good thing. Councils can be clogged up with minor applications; this will clear more resources for bigger projects which take more time.”

3 comments

  • There will be no flurry of loft extensions (as suggested in the article). The relaxation of the rules applies only to ground floor extensions. It's bound to set neighbour against neighbour though - and for no good reason.

    Report this comment

    bocadillo

    Friday, September 7, 2012

  • There will be no flurry of loft extensions (as suggested in the article). The relaxation of the rules applies only to ground floor extensions. It's bound to set neighbour against neighbour though - and for no good reason.

    Report this comment

    bocadillo

    Friday, September 7, 2012

  • My parents travelled to Canterbury recently and met a pensioner who is living in a caravan on a piece of land owned over many years by his family. The mans elder brother who has dimentia now built a house on the land with planning permission many years ago, which unfortunately about 12 years ago burnt down in a fire. It is absolutley disgraceful how canterbury planning department have drained this pensioners bank balance by forcing him to spend thousands on baristers to get permission to rebuild his house. The planning department have continually opposed his applications forcing him to continue to stay in a caravan at his age. The brother with dimentia is happiest whilst playing the piano, he comes to the piece of land regularly where he plays a piano set up under some plastic sheeting by his brother. It seems very strange to me that there are plans for the area available where quite large structures have been approved very very near by to built in the future. I ask my self how do the very authorities who are meant to ensure the safety of our country's pensioners justify this kind of behaviour. My parents have described to me how shocked they were after reading the paper work. They were so sad that this guy who is a barnardo's type charachter helping those less fortunate than him self where ever he can could have this happen to him. How can your house burn down and then the council planning department not give you permission to rebuild your family home. He now has nothing left financially after numerous applications. I have a good mind to write this up and go to the national press. So I hope the relaxation of planning laws happens sooner rather than later. I also hope very much that the relaxation clauses cover his case because if they do not this pensioner will remain in a caravan. I hope that those responsible for this wrong think about this comment whilst sleeping safely and comfortabley in their warm houses and beds.

    Report this comment

    rebekahbrant

    Thursday, September 6, 2012

NEWS WHERE YOU LIVE

News, sport, video, blogs and local information
where you live...

Join our newsletter



Local Weather

Rain

Rain

max temp: 7°C

min temp: 9°C

Five-day forecast

Travel News

No current major incidents

e-Edition CLICK TO READ NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, GUIDES AND NEWSLETTERS ONLINE


  • Kent on Sunday


    Kent on Saturday


    Kent Life


    Kent Bride


  • VK Rural 1


    VK Rural 2


    VK Rural 3


    VK Coastal 1


    VK Coastal 2


    VK Coastal 3


  • Your Health West


    Your Health East


    Community Health


    Isle


    Taste of Kent


  • Orchid


    Education for Kent