Police had ‘no evidence’ to restrict live export campaigners, says IPCC

PUBLISHED: 11:43 28 November 2014

Sheep on trucks en route to Ramsgate port

Sheep on trucks en route to Ramsgate port


Report followed complaint by animal right campaigner

A report by the Independent Police Complaints Commission has upheld an appeal from an animal rights campaigner regarding Kent Police’s treatment of live animal export protestors at Ramsgate port.

The complaint by Reg Bell claimed that police unfairly imposed a section 14 order on protestors in order to ‘corral’ them into a small holding area during a protest in 2012.

Section 14 involves anyone taking part in a protest having to remain in a designated area.

It can only be imposed if a senior police officer believes serious damage to property or other people, or unlawful acts or intimidation could take place as a result of the protestors’ activity.

The IPCC felt that former chief constable Ian Learmouth, who retired from Kent police in January, did not have grounds to impose the order.

A spokesman said: “The IPCC upheld an appeal from Mr Bell against the former Chief Constable of Kent Police’s use of section 14 orders to place restrictions on protests about live exports from the port of Ramsgate.

“It found the former Chief Constable arguably lacked a reasonable belief that it was the purpose of the organisers of the protest to intimidate, which is necessary to impose a section 14 order.

“The IPCC requested the Kent Police and Crime Commissioner raised the issue of the use of section 14 orders with a suitable person responsible for public order in Kent Police, to ensure that any future restrictions on protests are properly imposed.”

Assistant chief constable of Kent police, Jo Shiner, said: “We have continued to engage with protest groups, the ports, and other relevant agencies in our efforts to ensure the facilitation of both the export activity and the right to peacefully protest. The port is incredibly busy, and can be dangerous place.

“The use of the Section 14 order allows people their lawful right to protest without putting themselves or officers in danger.”


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Kent News visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Kent News staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Kent News account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Other popular content


A planning application was meant to be submitted by the end of this year but has now been delayed until the spring


Gravesham and Thanet haven’t settled any under the scheme so far, but have committed to do so by 2020


The Margate park’s showpiece ride was temporarily out of action due to maintenance work

Digital edition

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to the following newsletters:

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter
Kent Life Food & Drink awards 2016. Open for entries.

Most read

Local business directory

Kent's trusted business finder