Search

Charity angrily denies putting foxes in danger

PUBLISHED: 12:00 18 September 2011

Archant

An animal welfare charity has fired back at pro-hunting campaigners who claim the organisation is putting foxes’ lives in danger.

The internet-only Fieldsports Channel claims to have footage which proves injured scavengers nursed back to health by the Pembury-based Fox Project have been released near a free range chicken run in woodland near Maidstone.

Presenter Charlie Jacoby says the predators will die as a result of the practice, either through being shot by angry farmers or through starvation due to them not knowing how to hunt.

However, Fox Project director Trevor Williams has angrily denied the allegations and says the footage on the site is of a foster pen that foxes were not released from.

He added: “The Fox Project does not have a fox release pen in Maidstone, nor do we release where there is vulnerable livestock. It’s illogical – why would we invest time and money raising infant fox cubs on the bottle only to release them where we might expect them to be shot or snared?

“We do, however, have foster pens situated in the broader area, where cubs are raised remotely by rural householders, farmers and smallholders in order to maintain their wildness prior to transfer to designated release sites.

“These pens can only be reached or seen by someone deliberately trespassing deeply onto private land and not by an innocent dog walker who just happens to have both still and video cameras on his person, and who knows precisely which publications might be interested in the results.”

The Fieldsports Channel is a half-hour weekly internet show about hunting, shooting and fishing in Britain.

Earlier this year TV property expert Phil Spencer, from Littlebourne, near Canterbury, was branded a “bloodthirsty killer” for shooting a deer in front of the website’s cameras.

Presenter Charlie Jacoby said instances of foxes being released near livestock happen “over and over again” in the countryside.

He added: “I am sure these organisations deliberately choose release sites next to a good source of food; other people’s pets and livestock.

“Releasing foxes in the countryside is nuts, releasing them next to a free-range chicken run is dangerously idiotic, and feeding them on dog food before you do so is just plain cruel.

“It’s not a nice thing to say but there are lots of foxes. Our responsibility to pets is to the individual pet but with foxes we are talking about wildlife. Our responsibility to wildlife is to the whole species, and foxes do not need restocking.”

1 comment

  • What utter rot from The Fieldsports channel. "Foxes do not need restocking." The fox project release wild foxes back into the wild where they came from. There is nothing unnatural about this . . it is not restocking. He doesn't comment, I notice, about hunters actually breeding foxes just for the hunt . . . a widespread activity that the likes of the Countryside alliance and the Fieldsports Channel like to keep under their hats.

    Report this comment

    Angel Wolf

    Monday, September 19, 2011

Other popular content

Yesterday, 11:04

Police and RSPCA urge owners to be vigilant and for householders to check toxic chemicals not left exposed

Tue, 11:00

Health bosses predict up to 50 of the 900 people who attend the hospital each day will be affected over the next two to three months

Mon, 11:35

Dave, and Kip Wilson have been singing together for more than 20 years

Friday, March 17, 2017

They will play alongside X Factor’s Matt Terry and 90’s legends Space

Digital edition

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to the following newsletters:

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter
Kent Life Food & Drink awards 2016. Open for entries.

Most read

Local business directory

Kent's trusted business finder