• Search local news and sport:
  •  

Most Popular News Stories : Police look for man captured on CCTV networkNews Stories : Traffic chaos follows Thanet Way chemical spillNews Stories : 'Bloodgate' doctor given warning by GMC panel Sports Stories : Relegation looms for Kent after crushing defeatSports Stories : VIDEO - Gills boss previews Bury tripSports Stories : Spencer on England's World Cup semi-final winBlogs : Why the militant cyclist represents all that is worst about attitudes in BritainBlogs : Why there will be little sympathy for the inevitable council cutbacksBlogs : Time for FA to move on and make 2018 our year
Your Local Community
The latest news, sport, business, entertainment and local information where you live...
Speed camera tickets more than double in decade
Printable version Email to a friend Share this story Add your comment Contact us
The number of tickets given to motorists caught by speed cameras in Kent has more than doubled since 1997, government figures show.

And the controversial devices last year raked in nearly three times the amount they made sicne a decade ago in the county.

Home Office figures released this week showed that motorists in England and Wales are landed with nearly two million speeding tickets every year.

Defending the statistics, the Government insisted that speed cameras saved lives and cut serious injuries on the roads.

But motoring groups have attacked the safety claims, saying they are flawed. They say speed cameras are being used just to make money.

The figures published this week show the Kent and Medway Safety Camera Partnership dished out 28,706 speeding tickets in 1997. At £40 each, the fines were worth £1,148,240.

But by 2005, the number of tickets had gone up to 53,289. Each cost drivers £60 - generating a massive £3,197,340 in all.

And the partnership told the Saturday Observer that last year it issued 70,265 tickets - worth £4,215,900.

A spokesman for the Department for Transport said: “Independent research shows a 42 per cent reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured at camera sites - that means more than 100 fewer deaths each year.”

But Paul Smith, from campaign group Safe Speed, said: “The implied claim that cameras are responsible for the observed reduction is wholly falsified by the very same independent research."

Mr Smith added: “Speed cameras have been a road safety disaster. Despite millions of fines each year we have not even seen the road safety improvements that we expected.”

Roger Lawson, Kent spokesman for the Association for British Drivers, backed Safe Speed’s claims.

“If there is a fatal accident once a year, they put in a camera and next year when there is no fatal accident at that spot, they claim it was down to the camera.

“Fatal accidents are so random they rarely happen in exactly the same place.”

Mr Smith said there were 3,175 road deaths in 2006, which he claimed was around 1,200 more than what they should be if the cameras were doing their job.

“They should all be scrapped now,” he said. “The Government has had 15 years of them and it has been proved time and again they are not working. The DfT quite clearly knows they are a failed road safety policy.”

However, former Transport Minister Steve Ladyman, Labour MP for South Thanet, gave his full backing to the cameras.

Dr Ladyman, who used to have nine points on his licence after being snapped by speed cameras twice on the M2 and once on the A2, said: “There is no excuse for being caught. Drive at the speed limit which is clearly displayed.

"The speed cameras and speed limits do work. We have the safest roads in the world. They reduce deaths and serious injury.

"There are not too many speed cameras in Kent or in the country. They are only placed in black spots where there has been a history of fatal or serious accidents."

Rachel Wall, communications manager, for the Kent and Medway Safety Camera Partnership said: “Since July 2002 there has been a 58.3 per cent reduction in deaths and serious injuries at camera sites, which is excellent news.”

Set up in 2002, the partnership is made up of Kent County Council, Medway Council, the Highways Agency, Kent Police, and Her Majesty’s Courts Service.

The partnership stressed that not all fines issued were actually paid. Some drivers opted to take speed awareness classes instead, while others, including some foreign motorists, dodged the system and didn’t pay.



POSTED: 08/12/2007 07:00:00

If you¹ve got a complaint about your neighbourhood, or want to tell everyone about how great your town is, make a short film and post it on Your Kent TV service. Simply log on to YourKentTV.co.uk.

Bookmark with:
Email to a friend:
Comments:
Added: Tuesday 11/12/2007 18:36:42 UK
The numbers are going up because we're dealing with a lazy, complacent, arogant and incompetant government.

Speed cameras are an easy route out, instead of paying for essential road works in dangerous areas, the governments non elected tin pot little dictators just dump a camera there and watch the money roll in while the accidents continue to happen ....Browns version of uthopia, where he can make cocks ups pay for themselves!

Angry, Maidstone,
Added: Tuesday 11/12/2007 09:02:00 UK
Paul Smith hasn't done anyone any favours at all, his outrageous view has polarised the argument into two distinct camps where neither side is prepared to listen to the other. When genuine concern is raised it isn't being heard above the nonsense of the self appointed righteous ...if cameras actually caught people determind and deliberatly speeding, it'd be a different story, but as they can't, it's just a question of time till someone realises and the whole thing falls into disrepute!
Eric, New Romney,
Added: Monday 10/12/2007 12:27:31 UK
The number is going up because drivers are increasingly breaking the law!!!
Is a camera as good as a policeman... Of course not! but where a problem area exists, cameras can reduce the likelihood of further accidents, without having to post a copper 24/7.
Safe Speed is a one man crusade to be able drive at whatever speed the individual deems safe, masquerading as a road safety organisation - it's quite sick really!

Jamie, Maidstone, Kent
Added: Saturday 08/12/2007 07:38:05 UK
I find it more than a little insulting the authorities believe that the British public as a whole would fall for this charade.

How long do Gordon and Alistair believe they can get away with short changing us on national policing by deploying these bloody useless cameras?

Only a complete idiot would think they're any kind of alternative to real police and a deterrent to breaking the law.

People of the 1950's might have believed it was big brother, but the people of this century aren't impressed by a Polaroid camera on a stick.

The motorists appear to get hot under the collar about their loss of freedoms, while the lefties believe the road is a safer place due to the all seeing camera, meanwhile all these press releases fuel the story and get both sides arguing.

Do you really think people of this generation are that simple Mr Brown, I mean really? ..do you think we don't realise why you've got so much surplus money floating around to prop up failing banks?

This is truly the most stupid idea anyone in government has ever had!

Colin Wainwright, ,
ONLINE DIGITAL NEWS
Click to read your choice of local paper
Select an area:
Choose a newspaper:





INTERACTIVE
Click to read digital magazines, brochures and guides
LOCAL WEATHER TODAY
Sponsored by norfolkline.com
MIN  9 °C   MAX  19 °C     Sunny
Next 5 days
OPINION POLL
Should the police be protected from government budget cuts?
Search for jobs
Search for the latest JOBS in Kent
Enter job title or keywords Location (enter town or district)
     
Jobs by Email
Jobs by Email
Be the first to receive the latest jobs delivered to your inbox
Search for properties
Search for PROPERTY for sale in Kent
Property   
Price 
Bedrooms 
To     
Location (enter town or district) 
Search for cars
Find 1000s of CARS for sale
Make 
Model 
Min.   
Max.